Summary
Logical Arcade in which you have to destroy colored crystals and pass many levels with traps
| Minimum System Requirements | Recommended System Requirements | |
| CPU | 1.2GHz or faster processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
| RAM | 1 GB RAM | 4 GB |
| OS | Windows 7/8/10 | Unknown |
| Graphics Card | Video card must be 512 MB or more and should be a DirectX 9 | NVIDIA GeForce 510 |
| Direct X | Version 9.0 | |
| HDD Space | 100 MB available space | Unknown |
| Game Analysis | The cheapest graphics card you can play it on is an NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS. But, according to the developers the recommended graphics card is an NVIDIA GeForce 510. The minimum memory requirement for CRYLINE is 1 GB of RAM installed in your computer. If possible, make sure your have 4 GB of RAM in order to run CRYLINE to its full potential. To play CRYLINE you will need a minimum CPU equivalent to an Intel Pentium 4 2.00GHz. Whereas, an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 is recommended in order to run it. You will need at least 100 MB of free disk space to install CRYLINE. CRYLINE will run on PC system with Windows 7/8/10 and upwards. Additionally it has Mac and Linux versions. | |
| Minimum System Requirements | Recommended System Requirements | |
| CPU | Intel Core Duo 1.66GHz+ | |
| RAM | 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| OS | Mac OS X 10.7+ | |
| Graphics Card | 512 MB of video memory | |
| HDD Space | 100 MB available space | 100 MB available space |
| Minimum System Requirements | Recommended System Requirements | |
| CPU | 1.2GHz or faster processor | |
| RAM | 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| OS | Ubuntu 12.04 | |
| Graphics Card | 512 MB of video memory | |
| HDD Space | 100 MB available space | 100 MB available space |
Overview
Platforms
Release Dates
Related URL
Developers
Publishers
Genres
Game Modes
Game Themes
Languages
What's your reaction?
Very Bad
0%
Bad
0%
Average
0%
Alright
0%
Good
0%
Super
0%
This Game has no review yet, please come back later...
This Game has no news yet, please come back later...
This Game has no walkthrough yet, please come back later...
Comments