This content requires the base game Command: Modern Operations on Steam in
order to play.
## About This Content
Inspired by the most recent geopolitical events, Command: MO LIVE – Broken
Shield 300 scenario depicts how the Heyl Ha’Avir (or IAF, Israeli Air Force)
would act in case of a military escalation in Syria and its final activation
of S-300 missiles batteries to protect Iranian assets.
FEATURES
\- Playable as Israel (main side) and Syria (limited experience)
\- Carefully researched scenario featuring authentic representation of the
Israeli Air Force down to the individual tail numbers in the respective
squadrons
\- Feasible Russian made IADS network composed of both modern [S-300 PMU-2
(SA-20B), Buk (SA-17), Pantsir (SA-22)] and legacy [S-75 (SA-2), S-125 (SA-3),
S-200 (SA-5), Kvadrat (SA-6), Osa (SA-8)] air defense systems
\- Realistic “what if” scenario aimed at exploring the ways to crack up to
date IADS networks using all the tools available to a modern day western
commander like long range stand-off weapons, OECM platforms, space based
assets and even cyber attacks
\- Challenging scoring system based on the necessity of maintaining very low
to non casualties and extracting downed pilots from enemy territory via SAR
operations before they are captured by the enemy for propaganda purposes –
rich backstory along with a developing one through the scenario
BACKGROUND
After the downing of the Russian Il-20 on the 17th of September 2018,
southwest of Latakia in Syria, the Russian government reacted immediately in
an attempt to strengthen its ally’s air defenses. Soon, pictures of a S-300
battery arriving in Syria emerged. It was later officially stated that the
battery had four TELs and consisted of 49 vehicles in total. In the late
months of 2018, several reports in Russian media revealed that the delivered
air defense system was being downgraded to a S-300PMU-2 while the training of
Syrian personnel was taking place. Meanwhile there were other, unconfirmed,
reports based on information from a “unnamed, but high ranking and reliable
source within the Russian military”, stating that only three batteries had
been sent to Syria. In early 2019 the Syrians supposedly completed their
training program and the officially delivered S-300 battery became
operational, deployed just northeast of Masyaf, right next to the position of
a Russian S-400.
Following the delivery of the air defense system, many were expecting
immediate escalation and military action by Israel, but the contrary actually
happened – IAF sharply reduced its air activity over Lebanon and started
avoiding Syrian airspace. A number of meetings between the Prime Minister of
Israel and the President of Russia took place and it was widely believed that
a sort of secret agreement was achieved. On April 13, 2019 the IAF took out a
missile development center in a village near Masyaf, mere kilometers away from
the S-300 position that remained silent during the attack. In the next months
the situation went back to “normal” for the region with Israel performing
surgical strikes against shipments of advanced weapons and IRGC
infrastructure.
The situation escalated again on November 19, 2019 when IRGC related elements
launched 4 missiles against Israel which resulted in a massive retaliation
from the IAF targeting air defense systems, surface-to-air missiles,
reconnaissance sites and warehouses, even the National Defense Building at the
Damascus International Airport which houses the Quds Force headquarters and
other military positions. Tensions remained very high as Israel was expecting
retaliatory attack from Iran or Syria but were ultimately defused with Russian
involvement.
For a while it seemed that the crisis was averted, and a somewhat uneasy
balance of powers ensued, with Iranian proxy forces mostly engaged in the
fighting in Idlib. However, by the end of 2019 the situation in neighboring
Iraq was deteriorating rapidly as the tensions between US and Iran, who was
attacking US forces in Iraq using its proxies, were rising very fast.
On the 3rd of January 2020 came the news that could have sparked a new big war
in the Middle East – Iranian General, the leader of the Quds Force and
people’s icon, Qasem Soleimani was killed by US Armed forces near Baghdad
International Airport. Immediately, official Tehran swore to take “harsh
revenge” against US for that as they called it “act of State terrorism”. But
as the world trembled in fear awaiting war to erupt any second, there was
division between Iran’s leaders – the hardliners advocated for an all out
attack against US forces in the region and Israel, while others argued that
such attacks would trigger a real war and that a measured response is more
appropriate.
The tug of war between both parties continued in the following days
accompanied by a tragedy as dozens of people were crushed by the crowds
attending General Qasem Soleimani’s funeral. Fortunately, in the end cool
heads prevailed and Iran geared up for a mere “show of force” attack on the
Ayn al-Asad and Erbil airbases in Iraq, where US personnel was stationed. The
attack itself took place in the early hours on 8th of January 2020 with media
reporting “tens of ground-to-ground missiles” fired against both targets.
Millions of people and news agencies around the world waited anxiously for the
US response or for the first lights of the sun to pierce the darkness and to
reveal the true extent of the damage done by the Iranian missiles.
But the morning came with the sad news of another tragedy – the crash of
Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 near Tehran’s Imam Khomeini
International Airport. First reports and videos showed the plane going down
under controversial circumstances which coupled with the initial lack of an
official response to the Iranian attacks from the US Government, fueled panic
among some analysts who immediately signaled that war between the US and Iran
is imminent, or even that it may have already begun. However later in the day
US President addressed the nation, reassured the American public and the world
that no casualties were suffered during the Iranian attack, that there was no
major damage done to materiel and that the US Government will impose new
sanctions upon Iran. The war between the two states, that so many were so
firmly predicting, was not going to be, at least for the moment. The world
took a deep breath of relief as it seemed another major crisis was averted.
On the 11th of January 2020 another unexpected event happened – in a briefing
for the press, the IRGC Aerospace Commander openly admitted that Flight 752
was indeed accidently shot down by IRGC air defense unit. The high ranking
officers of the IRGC, the Quds Force and many Government officials were
anything but pleased with such a development. They not only strongly felt that
a “show of force” attack wasn’t enough to avenge General Soleimani’s death,
but they were further infuriated by the decision to admit the shootdown of
Flight 752 and the involvement of the IRGC in it. The Iranian hardliners were
simply not ready to accept such undermining of Iran’s influence in the region
and the politic consequences in Iran itself, with protests against the regime
erupting after the confession. Combined with the ever degrading economic
situation and further international isolation following the shootdown, the
situation was getting dire enough for them to take action. They felt that the
only way to distract the public and also to “truly avenge” the death of their
beloved General and national hero was to conduct a major attack against the
foreign enemies of the Iranian regime. However even the hardliners were
painfully aware that, for the moment, an open attack on US forces stationed in
the region would be suicidal, so they had only one viable option left to pick
from as their target – Israel, Iran’s other sworn enemy.
Knowing of the close relations between the US and Israel, the hardliners
feared an attack on the latter by Iranian armed forces might lead to a
combined military response by both states, especially in the current strained
relations with the US. So, the only way to conduct such an attack without
direct repercussions to Iran itself would be by using the proxy forces located
in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. These forces however needed some time for proper
preparation if the attacks were to be effective. Certain assets and weapons,
not yet present there would have to be positioned.
The usual small shipments were getting larger and way more frequent through
January 2019, suggesting that Iran was up to something. The USAF and IAF were
destroying some of them in Iraq and Syria respectively, but it was clear that
dangerous amount were getting through under the radar. The situation in the
region made international headlines again on 6. February 2020 when multiple
explosions shook the Damascus suburbs. As it later turned out the IAF
destroyed big shipment of advanced guidance systems that were supposed to
upgrade many of the Hezbollah’s missiles into very accurate weapons. The
shipment however was inside a Syrian military base at the time of the strike,
which resulted in significant amount of Syrian casualties due to massive
secondary explosions of the base armories. Following the latest fiasco in
Idlib and the unsatisfactory development of the talks with the opposition and
the Kurds, Damascus wanted to show some strength and reacted very violently to
the latest raid. In a prepared statement it was revealed that the delivery of
three S-300PMU-2 batteries, among other SAMs and radars, really took place
during 2019, that the training of their personnel was concluded and that they
will now deploy all those new systems around Damascus and T4, where they will
form an impenetrable shield to protect the Syrian sovereignty. It was further
stated that any new attempts made by Israel to attack targets within Syrian
territory will be met by both the Syrian Air Force and the Syrian Air Defense
Force, and that from now on they will fire not only at the Israeli guided
weapons, but also at the aircrafts carrying them – even if they are outside
Syrian airspace.
Russia was not happy with such significant development of the situation, but
there wasn’t much they could do to prevent an accident that could spark a
chain reaction, so they initiated diplomatic efforts trying to persuade Israel
to abandon its policy of attacking targets within Syrian territory with the
promise of executing real pressure on Iran, forcing it to stop deliveries of
weapons to Hezbollah in Lebanon through Syria. Meanwhile, assuming that Russia
has no other choice, but to take their side for the good of Syria, should
something go wrong, Iran decided to urgently airlift new shipment of advanced
guidance systems for Hezbollah’s missiles as replacement for the destroyed one
in order to stay on schedule for the planned missile attack against Israel,
that was to be performed from Lebanon. In the late hours of 12th February 2020
an Iranian cargo Boeing 747 took off from Bandar Abbas heading for Damascus.
After a heated debate, the Israeli Cabinet decided that such shipment simply
can’t be let intact – even if such actions risk a serious escalation in the
light of the recent Syrian threats. A few hours later the Prime Minister
authorized an air attack to neutralize the threat and before the first
sunlights appeared in the sky on the 13th February 2020, the Iranian Boeing
747 itself and the cargo it was transporting were no more than smoldering
remains scattered on one of Damascus International Airport’s tarmacs.
Since the numerous explosions and the work of the newly deployed air defense
systems were heard and seen by many, Syrian officials could not hide or
downplay the incident. They decided to again react violently, accusing Israel
of aggression and uncalled destruction of an unarmed aircraft, carrying
“humanitarian supplies”. As usual, the Syrian military representatives
declared yet another consecutive victory over the IAF, with numerous planes
and missiles shot down by the air defenses.
Usually such statements were always left without comment from the Israeli
side, but this time just 2 hours after the incident, press briefing was
announced for 07:00 local time. Such an extraordinary event quickly attracted
enough attention and rumors began to spread that the IAF might have indeed
lost some planes and that the situation might be very serious. At exactly
07:00 the Israeli Prime Minister himself stood in front of the journalists
giving an extended briefing in which he exposed the true cargo of the
destroyed aircraft and also told the media that this time the S-300 actually
opened fire at the IAF aircraft that were inside Israeli airspace at the time.
Thanks to their towed decoys, two F-16’s were only damaged but nearly a dozen
missiles had been fired. He further stated, that the Israeli Cabinet had
unanimously agreed, that the Syrian military has “crossed the red line” by
engaging aircrafts inside Israeli airspace in order to protect Iranian weapons
shipment. It was also revealed that the President of Russia will be hosting an
urgent meeting in Kremlin later that day in order to try and disarm the
current “very serious” situation. The statements that Israel is not looking
for an open conflict with Syria were followed by a promise that the IDF will
not take any provocative actions before or during the talks in Moscow in order
to give chance for any possible diplomatic solutions to the current crisis.
In a matter of minutes after the press briefing in Tel Aviv, Syria and Israel
were all over the world’s headlines. And while military experts and armchair
generals were speculating on the IAF’s chances to repeat its outstanding
victory in Beqaa Valley considering the involvement of “triple digit SAMs”
this time, the rest of world was now looking forward to the talks in Moscow
where for the first time ever Prime Minister Netanyahu will be sitting on one
table together with President Putin, President Assad and possibly even
President Rouhani. Yet again, in a matter of weeks, the stakes were much
higher than usual with possible armed conflict just around the corner…
Features
\- Playable as Israel (main side) and Syria (limited experience)
\- Carefully researched scenario featuring authentic representation of the
Israeli Air Force down to the individual tail numbers in the respective
squadrons
\- Feasible Russian made IADS network composed of both modern [S-300 PMU-2
(SA-20B), Buk (SA-17), Pantsir (SA-22)] and legacy [S-75 (SA-2), S-125 (SA-3),
S-200 (SA-5), Kvadrat (SA-6), Osa (SA-8)] air defense systems
\- Realistic “what if” scenario aimed at exploring the ways to crack up to
date IADS networks using all the tools available to a modern day western
commander like long range stand-off weapons, OECM platforms, space based
assets and even cyber attacks
\- Challenging scoring system based on the necessity of maintaining very low
to non casualties and extracting downed pilots from enemy territory via SAR
operations before they are captured by the enemy for propaganda purposes –
rich backstory along with a developing one through the scenario
Minimum System Requirements | ||
CPU | 1 GHz (Dual-core Pentium and above recommended) | |
RAM | 1 GB RAM | |
OS | Windows / 8/ 10 | |
Graphics Card | DirectX 9.0c compatible video card with 16 MB RAM | |
Direct X | Version 9.0c | |
SOUND CARD | Requires Windows Media Player |