Summary
A competitive battle simulation game that brings the MOBA genre closer to its RTS roots by allowing you to take full control of the battlefield. Take part in an intense, fast-paced battlefield and seize victory on the mythical battlegrounds like Ergenekon, Avalon, Zerzura and more!
| Minimum System Requirements | Recommended System Requirements | |
| CPU | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
| VRAM | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| RAM | 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| OS | Windows 7+ | Windows 7+ |
| Graphics Card | Open GL 3.2+ Compliant | Open GL 3.2+ Compliant |
| Direct X | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| SOUND CARD | Windows Compatible Card | Windows Compatible Card |
| HDD Space | 2 GB available space | 2 GB available space |
| Game Analysis | To play Battle Commanders you will need a minimum CPU equivalent to an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400. The cheapest graphics card you can play it on is an NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G. The minimum memory requirement for Battle Commanders is 2 GB of RAM installed in your computer. Additionally, the game developers recommend somewhere around 4 GB of RAM in your system. In terms of game file size, you will need at least 2 GB of free disk space available. Battle Commanders will run on PC system with Windows 7+ and upwards. Additionally it has Mac and Linux versions. | |
| Minimum System Requirements | Recommended System Requirements | |
| RAM | 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| OS | OSX 10.9+ | |
| Graphics Card | Open GL 3.2+ Compliant | Open GL 3.2+ Compliant |
| HDD Space | 2 GB available space | 2 GB available space |
| Minimum System Requirements | Recommended System Requirements | |
| RAM | 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| HDD Space | 2 GB available space | 2 GB available space |
Overview
Platforms
Related URL
Developers
Publishers
Genres
Game Engines
Game Modes
Game Themes
Languages
What's your reaction?
Very Bad
0%
Bad
0%
Average
0%
Alright
0%
Good
0%
Super
0%
This Game has no review yet, please come back later...
This Game has no news yet, please come back later...
This Game has no walkthrough yet, please come back later...
Comments